EC-Council CTIA Module 3.2 Practice Test 002

This practice test covers Module 3 (Planning, Direction, and Review) Sub-module 2 (Requirements Analysis).

These questions are inspired by the EC-Council CTIA exam and are designed to help you test your knowledge of cyber threat intelligence, threats and frameworks, and other related topics. Some questions require multiple correct answers.

These are not official exam questions or brain dumps. They are original scenario-based questions created to reflect the skills and knowledge tested in the CTIA exam.

Note: CTIA is a registered trademark of EC-Council. This content is not affiliated with or endorsed by EC-Council.

To choose CTIA practice tests based on specific modules and sub-modules, click that link

EC-Council CTIA Module 3.2 Practice Test 002
10 questions • Single best answer
Question 1
A threat intelligence analyst at a hospital network is helping leadership decide what the program should actually answer. Stakeholders disagree on priorities and timelines. What should be formally defined first to direct collection, analysis, and reporting toward stakeholder needs?
    Question 2
    An MSSP analyst is prioritizing a long backlog of intelligence requirements from multiple clients. Resources are limited and not everything can be addressed at once. Which prioritization technique sorts requirements into must-have, should-have, could-have, and will-not-have categories?
      Question 3
      A CTI program manager at a retail bank is documenting which assets, business units, and threats the program will cover. Executives want clear boundaries to avoid overcommitment. What is being defined when these inclusions and exclusions are formalized?
        Question 4
        A threat intelligence team at a federal agency is preparing to gather data from external and internal sources. Legal counsel insists on documented constraints on what is permitted. Which artifact defines the authorized limits, conduct, and legal boundaries for these activities?
          Question 5
          An analyst at a cloud services provider receives a vague request to "watch for ransomware threats." Leadership cannot act on the resulting reports. Which quality should a well-formed intelligence requirement have to make it actionable for collection and analysis?
            Question 6
            A CTI lead at a critical-infrastructure operator must decide which threats warrant program attention first. She maps adversaries against the systems whose loss would most harm operations. Which activity directly informs and validates the program's intelligence requirements?
              Question 7
              A SOC supporting an insurance firm gathers requirements from executives, IR responders, and vulnerability managers. Each group needs different detail and cadence. Why is mapping requirements to specific stakeholders essential during requirements analysis?
                Question 8
                An intelligence analyst at a logistics company labels several requirements as "won't have this time" during planning. A junior colleague asks why effort is spent recording items the program will not pursue. What is the main benefit of explicitly capturing deprioritized requirements?
                  Question 9
                  A threat intelligence team at a telecom provider distinguishes between an executive asking about strategic risk trends and a SOC asking for malicious IPs. They classify each request by intended consumer and decision level. This classification of requirements primarily reflects which dimension?
                    Question 10
                    A newly hired analyst at a fintech startup wants to begin pulling data before requirements are agreed upon. The CTI manager halts this to avoid wasted effort and irrelevant output. What is the primary risk of starting collection before requirements analysis is complete?

                      Leave a Comment

                      Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

                      Scroll to Top