EC-Council CTIA Module 7.2 Practice Test 001

This practice test covers Module 7 (Threat Hunting and Detection) Sub-module 2 (Threat Hunting Automation).

These questions are inspired by the EC-Council CTIA exam and are designed to help you test your knowledge of cyber threat intelligence, threats and frameworks, and other related topics. Some questions require multiple correct answers.

These are not official exam questions or brain dumps. They are original scenario-based questions created to reflect the skills and knowledge tested in the CTIA exam.

Note: CTIA is a registered trademark of EC-Council. This content is not affiliated with or endorsed by EC-Council.

To choose CTIA practice tests based on specific modules and sub-modules, click that link

EC-Council CTIA Module 7.2 Practice Test 001
10 questions • Single best answer
Question 1
A threat hunting team wants to automate the execution of repetitive hunt queries across their environment and have results automatically flagged for analyst review when anomalies are detected. Which tool category best enables this automated hunting capability?
    Question 2
    A threat hunter writes a Python script that queries the organization's SIEM API for unusual PowerShell execution patterns, compares results against a baseline of normal PowerShell usage, and automatically creates tickets for deviations exceeding a defined threshold. This automation example demonstrates what benefit?
      Question 3
      A threat hunting team integrates their threat intelligence platform with their SIEM via API. When a new threat actor TTP is added to the TIP, the system automatically generates and deploys a corresponding hunt query to the SIEM. This closes the loop between which two intelligence lifecycle activities?
        Question 4
        A threat hunting team uses Jupyter Notebooks to document and share hunt methodologies, including the data sources queried, hunt logic, and findings from previous campaigns. When a new threat intelligence report suggests a new hunting hypothesis, they adapt an existing notebook for the new scenario. What advantage does notebook-based hunting documentation provide?
          Question 5
          A threat hunter creates a hunt automation that uses machine learning-based anomaly detection to establish baseline behavior profiles for each user and device, then automatically flags deviations from these profiles for analyst review. This approach to hunting automation is based on what principle?
            Question 6
            A threat hunting team at a financial services company automates hunting using a Python script that ingests STIX indicators from their TIP, translates them to KQL queries, and submits them to Microsoft Sentinel for scheduled execution. This script represents which automation capability?
              Question 7
              A threat hunting automation system identifies 500 behavioral anomalies per day from automated queries. Due to analyst capacity constraints, only 20 anomalies can be manually investigated. The team implements an automated scoring and prioritization system that ranks anomalies by severity, intelligence correlation, and asset criticality. What problem does this system solve?
                Question 8
                A threat hunting team uses threat intelligence to drive automated hunting automation campaigns. After each campaign, findings are fed back into the CTI team's knowledge base and used to improve future hunting hypotheses. This iterative feedback loop is an example of what?
                  Question 9
                  A threat hunter uses the MITRE ATT&CK framework within an automated hunting platform to map the organization's current detection coverage, identify technique gaps, and automatically generate hunt queries for uncovered ATT&CK techniques. What does the automated gap-identification component specifically enable?
                    Question 10
                    A CTI-driven threat hunting automation platform receives a new STIX indicator bundle containing a malware hash, an associated domain, and a MITRE ATT&CK technique pattern. The platform automatically: (1) queries endpoints for the hash via EDR, (2) queries DNS logs for the domain, and (3) runs an ATT&CK-based behavioral hunt query in the SIEM. All three actions occur simultaneously within 3 minutes. What automation capability does this describe?

                      Leave a Comment

                      Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

                      Scroll to Top